Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-24 00:45:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF56A54EF0F894BFF98633B5BE9D86A0B1E714A55EAF2CC34EFAFBF60276E7ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the tweet could be untrue, it is a personal story that isn't easy to verify without more information. Another account simply stating that they think it's fake is not evidence of anything. Maybe untrue, but in its current state, note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1648968875764244480
participantId -
raterParticipantId - EF56A54EF0F894BFF98633B5BE9D86A0B1E714A55EAF2CC34EFAFBF60276E7ED
createdAtMillis - 1682297116270
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1648968875764244480EF56A54EF0F894BFF98633B5BE9D86A0B1E714A55EAF2CC34EFAFBF60276E7ED