Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-20 14:26:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EE056A4D3F8F42FC1CB0EE8E94CCE8C4AB71426C32F06395ABC4ED68B8CFB1FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the tweet could be untrue, it is a personal story that isn't easy to verify without more information. Another account simply stating that they think it's fake is not evidence of anything. Maybe untrue, but in its current state, note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1648968875764244480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EE056A4D3F8F42FC1CB0EE8E94CCE8C4AB71426C32F06395ABC4ED68B8CFB1FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1682000801295
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1648968875764244480EE056A4D3F8F42FC1CB0EE8E94CCE8C4AB71426C32F06395ABC4ED68B8CFB1FC