Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-20 12:02:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A0109544F17FA187F056F2038010CF8561A69EDFE967AF8E2CA4A8258D51F95
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the tweet could be untrue, it is a personal story that isn't easy to verify without more information. Another account simply stating that they think it's fake is not evidence of anything. Maybe untrue, but in its current state, note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1648968875764244480
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5A0109544F17FA187F056F2038010CF8561A69EDFE967AF8E2CA4A8258D51F95
createdAtMillis - 1681992177495
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16489688757642444805A0109544F17FA187F056F2038010CF8561A69EDFE967AF8E2CA4A8258D51F95