Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-20 12:57:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F95D7FAD76D63AA6CBE89E8C38F3873E03E88D6A69FA28918034C083A8F0D21
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the tweet could be untrue, it is a personal story that isn't easy to verify without more information. Another account simply stating that they think it's fake is not evidence of anything. Maybe untrue, but in its current state, note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1648968875764244480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F95D7FAD76D63AA6CBE89E8C38F3873E03E88D6A69FA28918034C083A8F0D21
  • createdAtMillis - 1681995440162
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16489688757642444804F95D7FAD76D63AA6CBE89E8C38F3873E03E88D6A69FA28918034C083A8F0D21