Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-20 12:49:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E954EFA226944EE4FEFCEDCDD58C8FC940C09095626D2E834208D647985D228
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the tweet could be untrue, it is a personal story that isn't easy to verify without more information. Another account simply stating that they think it's fake is not evidence of anything. Maybe untrue, but in its current state, note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1648968875764244480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E954EFA226944EE4FEFCEDCDD58C8FC940C09095626D2E834208D647985D228
  • createdAtMillis - 1681994996070
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16489688757642444804E954EFA226944EE4FEFCEDCDD58C8FC940C09095626D2E834208D647985D228