Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-20 17:43:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E10A0D24E194F5A0A05FF8987B88B00B8FC2B4F189C6B840C739E7ECB5EE80A
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the tweet could be untrue, it is a personal story that isn't easy to verify without more information. Another account simply stating that they think it's fake is not evidence of anything. Maybe untrue, but in its current state, note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1648968875764244480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E10A0D24E194F5A0A05FF8987B88B00B8FC2B4F189C6B840C739E7ECB5EE80A
  • createdAtMillis - 1682012632501
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16489688757642444804E10A0D24E194F5A0A05FF8987B88B00B8FC2B4F189C6B840C739E7ECB5EE80A