Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-20 01:39:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EE47D78AA4E2B8E3249651927505C257A89E390EA894DB195E94581C9EE1B5AE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The other note uses a site litterally named conservative review.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1648820217097887746
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EE47D78AA4E2B8E3249651927505C257A89E390EA894DB195E94581C9EE1B5AE
  • createdAtMillis - 1681954747330
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1648820217097887746EE47D78AA4E2B8E3249651927505C257A89E390EA894DB195E94581C9EE1B5AE