Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-20 00:43:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0796FF42D03EE3211AC01FE3B03ED35791FE0EA5894F408EAF65E29A3390F889
Participant Details

Original Note:

The other note uses a site litterally named conservative review.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1648820217097887746
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0796FF42D03EE3211AC01FE3B03ED35791FE0EA5894F408EAF65E29A3390F889
  • createdAtMillis - 1681951402172
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16488202170978877460796FF42D03EE3211AC01FE3B03ED35791FE0EA5894F408EAF65E29A3390F889