Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-18 18:56:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0FA9D956CB8BA82C2774F1FD8BC999AEE9D6D9BA19A325F659C03B74B239FC4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The NYT article referred to here has been labelled as misinformation by those familiar with the industry for its lack of complete data, altered images, and unverified claims. https://www.btcpolicy.org/articles/the-absurdity-of-the-nyts-latest-bitcoin-hit-piece

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1648399453903106050
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0FA9D956CB8BA82C2774F1FD8BC999AEE9D6D9BA19A325F659C03B74B239FC4
  • createdAtMillis - 1681844180031
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1648399453903106050F0FA9D956CB8BA82C2774F1FD8BC999AEE9D6D9BA19A325F659C03B74B239FC4