Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-23 06:49:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 27A8226DE26E983184C43B6AF783365B212FE02286AB00234093762D4BCD8E25
Participant Details

Original Note:

The NYT article referred to here has been labelled as misinformation by those familiar with the industry for its lack of complete data, altered images, and unverified claims. https://www.btcpolicy.org/articles/the-absurdity-of-the-nyts-latest-bitcoin-hit-piece

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1648399453903106050
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 27A8226DE26E983184C43B6AF783365B212FE02286AB00234093762D4BCD8E25
  • createdAtMillis - 1727074188594
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164839945390310605027A8226DE26E983184C43B6AF783365B212FE02286AB00234093762D4BCD8E25