Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-17 18:05:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5ABF0AAFF8E59DE8C1E3FB53686C20423673E22EF0E13EAC525D5854CE90248D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Montgomerie has stated that this was a technical issue at their end, not with the production itself. Either way it offers no weight against this being a truthful representation of the interview. https://twitter.com/katymontgomerie/status/1647345320718655495 https://twitter.com/KatyMontgomerie/status/1647902725143666690

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1647993802508910592
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5ABF0AAFF8E59DE8C1E3FB53686C20423673E22EF0E13EAC525D5854CE90248D
createdAtMillis - 1681754713000
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16479938025089105925ABF0AAFF8E59DE8C1E3FB53686C20423673E22EF0E13EAC525D5854CE90248D