Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-17 06:40:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6AAE4921FEF5E90105187A91879B3E605B460F2FC13EF66481D65EF01C2E75A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Apologist for old growth logging ignores gigantic old growth trees, and mislabels the trees as second growth because some second growth might be in the photo. The size of the main subjects of the photos are clearly old growth: https://t.co/g9Ph41Aefo

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1647837757958676480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6AAE4921FEF5E90105187A91879B3E605B460F2FC13EF66481D65EF01C2E75A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1681713615050
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16478377579586764806AAE4921FEF5E90105187A91879B3E605B460F2FC13EF66481D65EF01C2E75A5