Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-17 06:40:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1701E013591E51DB53C9F677FD92A1049C1BFA14E8C12A9D5C5717491A4C9A6A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Apologist for old growth logging ignores gigantic old growth trees, and mislabels the trees as second growth because some second growth might be in the photo. The size of the main subjects of the photos are clearly old growth: https://t.co/g9Ph41Aefo

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1647837757958676480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1701E013591E51DB53C9F677FD92A1049C1BFA14E8C12A9D5C5717491A4C9A6A
  • createdAtMillis - 1681713615050
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16478377579586764801701E013591E51DB53C9F677FD92A1049C1BFA14E8C12A9D5C5717491A4C9A6A