Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-17 11:20:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D690C35302B58DD4B3FEC36EBE4C5BEF238A6491CC5EA4BA205CC96B15F3E5C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is not misleading because it's only expressing an opinion, so nothing needs to be added for context. Any challenges or supplemental information should be addressed in replies to the tweet author. No note is needed. Here are some helpful note-writing tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1647785761511538688
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D690C35302B58DD4B3FEC36EBE4C5BEF238A6491CC5EA4BA205CC96B15F3E5C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1681730438854
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1647785761511538688D690C35302B58DD4B3FEC36EBE4C5BEF238A6491CC5EA4BA205CC96B15F3E5C2