Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-17 02:26:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D554BDB2A4397C56167ADF0E5D76409B2EDC0EE0D45C142E6AD8D729AE817A0C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is not misleading because it's only expressing an opinion, so nothing needs to be added for context. Any challenges or supplemental information should be addressed in replies to the tweet author. No note is needed. Here are some helpful note-writing tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1647785761511538688
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D554BDB2A4397C56167ADF0E5D76409B2EDC0EE0D45C142E6AD8D729AE817A0C
  • createdAtMillis - 1681698395446
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1647785761511538688D554BDB2A4397C56167ADF0E5D76409B2EDC0EE0D45C142E6AD8D729AE817A0C