Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-16 21:06:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FA634FD74F442746A3DB016383AC908445C99DF9C084E82CCBA0FFD096553AD5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet states an accurate fact. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmc2201761 The note in no way changes or challenges the accuracy of that fact. It is irrelevant to the tweet. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1647681081523437570
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FA634FD74F442746A3DB016383AC908445C99DF9C084E82CCBA0FFD096553AD5
  • createdAtMillis - 1681679205633
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1647681081523437570FA634FD74F442746A3DB016383AC908445C99DF9C084E82CCBA0FFD096553AD5