Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-17 06:16:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 171B4205C23F4F98D08A9B244BD483E8B361C4CA8AA76BD4A8D2DDFD411C486A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet is factual, so that's why nothing needs to be added for context. Any challenges or supplemental information should be discussed in replies. No note is needed. The efforts of the newer Community Note members are appreciated. Here are some helpful note-writing tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1647635210215866372
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 171B4205C23F4F98D08A9B244BD483E8B361C4CA8AA76BD4A8D2DDFD411C486A
  • createdAtMillis - 1681712184880
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1647635210215866372171B4205C23F4F98D08A9B244BD483E8B361C4CA8AA76BD4A8D2DDFD411C486A