Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-15 20:34:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0F55594DE3638585ED5AFE9BFF5C89945D16AF3FCC1670212AE4BCB43AD3FED
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a personal opinion. Any disagreement with this tweet belongs in the replies. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html Contrary to what the proposed note suggest, the OP is not trying to deny or hide the fact that Teixeira is being charged for leaking classified information.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1647207495327154176
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0F55594DE3638585ED5AFE9BFF5C89945D16AF3FCC1670212AE4BCB43AD3FED
  • createdAtMillis - 1681590862603
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1647207495327154176F0F55594DE3638585ED5AFE9BFF5C89945D16AF3FCC1670212AE4BCB43AD3FED