Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-21 20:56:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 119EA96F74F387E5903452A576A9DE184693BF4198201CC8C7B1E19FA5FC0EF6
Participant Details

Original Note:

While confusingly worded, this tweet is factually correct. The wording in the bill is vague enough that gender affirming care may be classified as child sexual abuse, especially in tandem with other bills. This has already happened in texas https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/23/us/texas-attorney-general-gender-affirmation-child-abuse/index.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1647159874604740609
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 119EA96F74F387E5903452A576A9DE184693BF4198201CC8C7B1E19FA5FC0EF6
  • createdAtMillis - 1682110618962
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1647159874604740609119EA96F74F387E5903452A576A9DE184693BF4198201CC8C7B1E19FA5FC0EF6