Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-15 18:29:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE851AEDC48D8DF8E5C03F5FD60D2DB7740F9C6FC6B49ACB90FF8C2E3806F7CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The interviewer, by his own admission, clearly hadn't prepared and couldn't give a single example of what he claimed were hateful tweets

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1647148907393056768
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE851AEDC48D8DF8E5C03F5FD60D2DB7740F9C6FC6B49ACB90FF8C2E3806F7CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1681583371982
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1647148907393056768CE851AEDC48D8DF8E5C03F5FD60D2DB7740F9C6FC6B49ACB90FF8C2E3806F7CD