Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-16 15:15:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2F1E148E62276FF995A4480A9B87C1F2CAAFC522D4E432927F446677D1ACD5FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet reporting on what sources have told them; this is not misleading or out of context. Counter-claims of fundraising success do not render it misleading and go in replies. (On the other hand, if FEC FILINGS demonstrated fundraising success, then I would agree w/need for note.)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646878352626573313
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2F1E148E62276FF995A4480A9B87C1F2CAAFC522D4E432927F446677D1ACD5FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1681658142022
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16468783526265733132F1E148E62276FF995A4480A9B87C1F2CAAFC522D4E432927F446677D1ACD5FE