Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-14 00:09:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A5241098E2D93198A096CD04632DD0DE1F99E88AE2225C768BBA58012A4CF94B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The intent of this Tweet is an attempt to be humorous and to express the author's opinion, so nothing needs to be added. The important information contained in the above notes should be discussed in replies to the Tweet author. No note is needed. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646650672853516293
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A5241098E2D93198A096CD04632DD0DE1F99E88AE2225C768BBA58012A4CF94B
  • createdAtMillis - 1681430978176
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1646650672853516293A5241098E2D93198A096CD04632DD0DE1F99E88AE2225C768BBA58012A4CF94B