Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-14 01:14:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 417132E070B5B19EBF50D7C6EB9D1FFEDFF33785E5C73E0663B62439FDDD4246
Participant Details

Original Note:

The intent of this Tweet is an attempt to be humorous and to express the author's opinion, so nothing needs to be added. The important information contained in the above notes should be discussed in replies to the Tweet author. No note is needed. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646650672853516293
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 417132E070B5B19EBF50D7C6EB9D1FFEDFF33785E5C73E0663B62439FDDD4246
  • createdAtMillis - 1681434870483
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1646650672853516293417132E070B5B19EBF50D7C6EB9D1FFEDFF33785E5C73E0663B62439FDDD4246