Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-14 04:34:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F4C9EBD6460F3DEC0D7B8B72E7D5348EF1A4AA617ECD4A917C13A2B103D0DB94
Participant Details

Original Note:

In DC v Heller, Scalia wrote of this argument, “Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment” https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/554/570/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646574958112276481
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F4C9EBD6460F3DEC0D7B8B72E7D5348EF1A4AA617ECD4A917C13A2B103D0DB94
  • createdAtMillis - 1681446854291
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1646574958112276481F4C9EBD6460F3DEC0D7B8B72E7D5348EF1A4AA617ECD4A917C13A2B103D0DB94