Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-13 18:43:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BA1D68C21E6AE4B3BA33A52A0F60DAC6353B40C0FFD77E0846D7C94E7349280B
Participant Details

Original Note:

In DC v Heller, Scalia wrote of this argument, “Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment” https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/554/570/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646574958112276481
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BA1D68C21E6AE4B3BA33A52A0F60DAC6353B40C0FFD77E0846D7C94E7349280B
  • createdAtMillis - 1681411417984
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1646574958112276481BA1D68C21E6AE4B3BA33A52A0F60DAC6353B40C0FFD77E0846D7C94E7349280B