Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-15 06:32:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AACC40A768D78D35A18680FEEA65DC2B11C14096B42A3308841BF1A3FAA745CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

In DC v Heller, Scalia wrote of this argument, “Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment” https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/554/570/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646574958112276481
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AACC40A768D78D35A18680FEEA65DC2B11C14096B42A3308841BF1A3FAA745CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1681540364060
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1646574958112276481AACC40A768D78D35A18680FEEA65DC2B11C14096B42A3308841BF1A3FAA745CE