Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-15 12:58:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5ED4A01220BFD98C2C0E2A231E0B0111B78ACB162E1D2B5374217FC1F7E8B285
Participant Details

Original Note:

In DC v Heller, Scalia wrote of this argument, “Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment” https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/554/570/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646574958112276481
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5ED4A01220BFD98C2C0E2A231E0B0111B78ACB162E1D2B5374217FC1F7E8B285
  • createdAtMillis - 1718456331933
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16465749581122764815ED4A01220BFD98C2C0E2A231E0B0111B78ACB162E1D2B5374217FC1F7E8B285