Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-13 18:48:13 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 13E98EC9883C77DFF02635033A2E1E83133EFFC5E4D1F8F99585127893A0E8A9
Participant Details

Original Note:

In DC v Heller, Scalia wrote of this argument, “Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment” https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/554/570/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646574958112276481
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 13E98EC9883C77DFF02635033A2E1E83133EFFC5E4D1F8F99585127893A0E8A9
  • createdAtMillis - 1681411693219
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164657495811227648113E98EC9883C77DFF02635033A2E1E83133EFFC5E4D1F8F99585127893A0E8A9