Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-14 15:03:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C035D750AB8B340BF49F5276E70A2C3A8A302DFF0D6C9DA3A98A5C9AF54F1FBC
Participant Details

Original Note:

A previous note claims that BUD has not lost stock value and uses a date in March (before the controversy in question). A closer look clearly shows lost stock value after the controversy with a certain influencer. https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/bud

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646550846010712064
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C035D750AB8B340BF49F5276E70A2C3A8A302DFF0D6C9DA3A98A5C9AF54F1FBC
  • createdAtMillis - 1681484598666
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1646550846010712064C035D750AB8B340BF49F5276E70A2C3A8A302DFF0D6C9DA3A98A5C9AF54F1FBC