Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-13 23:28:52 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7D13A01F5D1BA943F067451B4E9FE761F9E91D642D3EE976B9D7DAAA2833E58F
Participant Details

Original Note:

A previous note claims that BUD has not lost stock value and uses a date in March (before the controversy in question). A closer look clearly shows lost stock value after the controversy with a certain influencer. https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/bud

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646550846010712064
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7D13A01F5D1BA943F067451B4E9FE761F9E91D642D3EE976B9D7DAAA2833E58F
  • createdAtMillis - 1681428532798
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16465508460107120647D13A01F5D1BA943F067451B4E9FE761F9E91D642D3EE976B9D7DAAA2833E58F