Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-13 17:26:10 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 719D1C53F44BDAD7D267196440951D6E87681A4B1B65D9EB5D773560A81FD506
Participant Details

Original Note:

A previous note claims that BUD has not lost stock value and uses a date in March (before the controversy in question). A closer look clearly shows lost stock value after the controversy with a certain influencer. https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/bud

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646550846010712064
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 719D1C53F44BDAD7D267196440951D6E87681A4B1B65D9EB5D773560A81FD506
  • createdAtMillis - 1681406770870
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1646550846010712064719D1C53F44BDAD7D267196440951D6E87681A4B1B65D9EB5D773560A81FD506