Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-13 17:21:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 666EB2F0D1362A2A446C2CAEF802CD85D99072E7D6313B7483E7B3129CCE348B
Participant Details

Original Note:

A previous note claims that BUD has not lost stock value and uses a date in March (before the controversy in question). A closer look clearly shows lost stock value after the controversy with a certain influencer. https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/bud

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646550846010712064
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 666EB2F0D1362A2A446C2CAEF802CD85D99072E7D6313B7483E7B3129CCE348B
  • createdAtMillis - 1681406491471
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1646550846010712064666EB2F0D1362A2A446C2CAEF802CD85D99072E7D6313B7483E7B3129CCE348B