Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-15 13:26:12 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5924738F167BE21F8D9241E59AE0C17D76E81B4630D929A9D9FF378A9FDDA16C
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. The unconstitutional nature of such a ban is not relevant to the actual tweet itself. That can be pointed out in the replies. CN is not the place for such a debate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646467564204175362
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5924738F167BE21F8D9241E59AE0C17D76E81B4630D929A9D9FF378A9FDDA16C
  • createdAtMillis - 1681565172656
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16464675642041753625924738F167BE21F8D9241E59AE0C17D76E81B4630D929A9D9FF378A9FDDA16C