Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-13 02:50:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9DA71848E74D53318E45BB79AE74D9E5107FA56CB33578BAF7E0BE312DDBA06B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Already gives context. Whether "sources" agree with the BBC (on what?) is an irrelevant opinion. "Bad journalism"=opinion. Accused "lie" is regarding the journalist seeing more hateful content on *his* feed. Tufts article is extremely poor quality, treats "groomer" as anti-lgbt

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646289090793590784
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9DA71848E74D53318E45BB79AE74D9E5107FA56CB33578BAF7E0BE312DDBA06B
  • createdAtMillis - 1681354224091
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16462890907935907849DA71848E74D53318E45BB79AE74D9E5107FA56CB33578BAF7E0BE312DDBA06B