Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-14 03:01:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F310675B6F2CC055B58EB6D18A4EB90F482E7892BD1EB4F517300DE94DF4C65
Participant Details

Original Note:

Already gives context. Whether "sources" agree with the BBC (on what?) is an irrelevant opinion. "Bad journalism"=opinion. Accused "lie" is regarding the journalist seeing more hateful content on *his* feed. Tufts article is extremely poor quality, treats "groomer" as anti-lgbt

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646289090793590784
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F310675B6F2CC055B58EB6D18A4EB90F482E7892BD1EB4F517300DE94DF4C65
  • createdAtMillis - 1681441279611
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16462890907935907840F310675B6F2CC055B58EB6D18A4EB90F482E7892BD1EB4F517300DE94DF4C65