Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-13 20:08:51 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C4B7F5F9428AC050A8457A20B7A115BB9800C5E9929C51D352AE6645543BAC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Already gives context. Whether "sources" agree with the BBC (on what?) is an irrelevant opinion. "Bad journalism"=opinion. Accused "lie" is regarding the journalist seeing more hateful content on *his* feed. Tufts article is extremely poor quality, treats "groomer" as anti-lgbt

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646289090793590784
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0C4B7F5F9428AC050A8457A20B7A115BB9800C5E9929C51D352AE6645543BAC9
  • createdAtMillis - 1681416531848
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16462890907935907840C4B7F5F9428AC050A8457A20B7A115BB9800C5E9929C51D352AE6645543BAC9