Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-13 03:29:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 804829D00BAA2A5B6BD1F14CBF6BAE91C3299C9CC86AB186F1EDCFB3A485D163
Participant Details

Original Note:

No notes needed. Tweet is an opinion on the Washington Post article. Disagreement with the Washington Post article belongs in discussions. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html, not notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646231868570730497
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 804829D00BAA2A5B6BD1F14CBF6BAE91C3299C9CC86AB186F1EDCFB3A485D163
  • createdAtMillis - 1681356579122
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1646231868570730497804829D00BAA2A5B6BD1F14CBF6BAE91C3299C9CC86AB186F1EDCFB3A485D163