Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-12 22:22:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7770F659EC13B2E7009328F16CEB6E3B9FD64D8C918A4EB73BEA4CF537074354
Participant Details

Original Note:

No notes needed. Tweet is an opinion on the Washington Post article. Disagreement with the Washington Post article belongs in discussions. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html, not notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646231868570730497
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7770F659EC13B2E7009328F16CEB6E3B9FD64D8C918A4EB73BEA4CF537074354
  • createdAtMillis - 1681338132964
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16462318685707304977770F659EC13B2E7009328F16CEB6E3B9FD64D8C918A4EB73BEA4CF537074354