Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-12 06:22:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 46F0DC2E2D70C72230C79A6A095CB48DF62F70780D4D060F0066947AE4F2BD77
Participant Details

Original Note:

A web search of the proposed name and city indicates that this is inaccurate information. A review of the poster’s timeline shows numerous claims of a similar nature. While it may be opinion, it’s presented as fact, and therefore is misleading. Clarification required.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646021852282884097
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 46F0DC2E2D70C72230C79A6A095CB48DF62F70780D4D060F0066947AE4F2BD77
  • createdAtMillis - 1681280551016
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164602185228288409746F0DC2E2D70C72230C79A6A095CB48DF62F70780D4D060F0066947AE4F2BD77