Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-12 05:02:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0DFCE60E754F450DECA39C29CC9676DFFFAE30FE4DE95C7AB1067A04DBC1887
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note necessary. As suggested note itself concedes, this tweet is opinion, not misleading. Any context or debate about the tweet's author belong in the replies--Community Notes are for providing context to misleading tweets or false claims, not "easy dunks" per the CN rules: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/writing-notes.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646005892851068929
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0DFCE60E754F450DECA39C29CC9676DFFFAE30FE4DE95C7AB1067A04DBC1887
  • createdAtMillis - 1681275729485
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1646005892851068929F0DFCE60E754F450DECA39C29CC9676DFFFAE30FE4DE95C7AB1067A04DBC1887