Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-12 07:59:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: BE8A3A7A662B58DC744F915D83111E47E6511FC1E8FB3F95D4F473BC3EB2C87E
Participant Details
Original Note:
Proposed note omits the larger context: this is the same basis that officials had previously blocked same-sex marriage in defiance of court orders. It is a reasonable assumption that this is the intent of the bill here, given the recent history. Not misleading, no note needed. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/02/us/same-sex-marriage-kentucky-kim-davis.html?smid=pl-share
All Note Details