Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-12 15:39:22 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: ADF97A91912CF8DAB7A318D4F42C6851D2BCD5D2C73A54B8C030C286F4E2DD23
Participant Details
Original Note:
Proposed note omits the larger context: this is the same basis that officials had previously blocked same-sex marriage in defiance of court orders. It is a reasonable assumption that this is the intent of the bill here, given the recent history. Not misleading, no note needed. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/02/us/same-sex-marriage-kentucky-kim-davis.html?smid=pl-share
All Note Details