Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-12 09:00:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 7DAAA5FE09E12C34B5BD52825A4003C1C2C74609DC0C83BA3BF6CBC9E35BE5E9
Participant Details
Original Note:
Proposed note omits the larger context: this is the same basis that officials had previously blocked same-sex marriage in defiance of court orders. It is a reasonable assumption that this is the intent of the bill here, given the recent history. Not misleading, no note needed. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/02/us/same-sex-marriage-kentucky-kim-davis.html?smid=pl-share
All Note Details