Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-12 02:10:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 79F94DF5474F4A6755A3EF2C1E8FD42056FEDFE02CAC3A43A49934E0DDC2E2D0
Participant Details
Original Note:
Proposed note omits the larger context: this is the same basis that officials had previously blocked same-sex marriage in defiance of court orders. It is a reasonable assumption that this is the intent of the bill here, given the recent history. Not misleading, no note needed. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/02/us/same-sex-marriage-kentucky-kim-davis.html?smid=pl-share
All Note Details