Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-13 01:57:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 64FF9AC4D0F26ACE4E4F5BFEB01846D0E688CC877CFD1AB50DCC70FACBF8D886
Participant Details
Original Note:
Proposed note omits the larger context: this is the same basis that officials had previously blocked same-sex marriage in defiance of court orders. It is a reasonable assumption that this is the intent of the bill here, given the recent history. Not misleading, no note needed. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/02/us/same-sex-marriage-kentucky-kim-davis.html?smid=pl-share
All Note Details