Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-13 00:52:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4EFE941EEE443BB7CC6EE07F79670B2B14FD67012FCF750117419F5C64A9B567
Participant Details
Original Note:
Proposed note omits the larger context: this is the same basis that officials had previously blocked same-sex marriage in defiance of court orders. It is a reasonable assumption that this is the intent of the bill here, given the recent history. Not misleading, no note needed. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/02/us/same-sex-marriage-kentucky-kim-davis.html?smid=pl-share
All Note Details