Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-11 04:45:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5650696CA7A05FD46109E366C06505F4AA4CBADBEE61DF17EC0C165B1D1D8D0E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet author is expressing an opinion, so nothing needs to be added for context. Any challenges or supplemental information, whether for or against needing context, should be discussed in replies. No Note Needed. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1645634649396510722
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5650696CA7A05FD46109E366C06505F4AA4CBADBEE61DF17EC0C165B1D1D8D0E
  • createdAtMillis - 1681188353555
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16456346493965107225650696CA7A05FD46109E366C06505F4AA4CBADBEE61DF17EC0C165B1D1D8D0E