Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-14 17:11:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 180FE006499D210262A815A29A42009DB81CE6E254A50DE4254D20E61FC92142
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet author is expressing an opinion, so nothing needs to be added for context. Any challenges or supplemental information, whether for or against needing context, should be discussed in replies. No Note Needed. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1645634649396510722
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 180FE006499D210262A815A29A42009DB81CE6E254A50DE4254D20E61FC92142
  • createdAtMillis - 1681492262008
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1645634649396510722180FE006499D210262A815A29A42009DB81CE6E254A50DE4254D20E61FC92142