Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-17 05:49:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D5F78B562972A7B74374443B23C3AD24E20F35A6E0EAA23628F54A5DFC6F40E2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet author is expressing an opinion, so nothing needs to be added for context. Any challenges or supplemental information, whether for or against needing context, is important and should be discussed in replies. No Note Needed. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1645633262554071040
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D5F78B562972A7B74374443B23C3AD24E20F35A6E0EAA23628F54A5DFC6F40E2
  • createdAtMillis - 1681710558439
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1645633262554071040D5F78B562972A7B74374443B23C3AD24E20F35A6E0EAA23628F54A5DFC6F40E2