Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-11 20:35:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9248FF0D51BE306089B8FA2674691A67C57D0F7292088BE325A3C168434E822C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet author is expressing an opinion, so nothing needs to be added for context. Any challenges or supplemental information, whether for or against needing context, is important and should be discussed in replies. No Note Needed. Note-writing Tips: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1645633262554071040
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9248FF0D51BE306089B8FA2674691A67C57D0F7292088BE325A3C168434E822C
  • createdAtMillis - 1681245331489
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16456332625540710409248FF0D51BE306089B8FA2674691A67C57D0F7292088BE325A3C168434E822C